US Pavilion
Biennale Architettura 2023
May 20–November 26

The Ontological Slippage and the Amassing Utility of Blackness

While scholars of race have critiqued the conflation of black(ened) humans with animals, objects, and machines in Enlightenment discourses, my concept of ontologized plasticization reframes the confluence of blackness and the nonhuman. My book Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World reinterprets Enlightenment thought not as black “exclusion” or “denied humanity” but rather as the violent imposition and appropriation—inclusion and recognition—of black(ened) humanity in the interest of plasticizing that very humanity, whereby “the animal” or “the machine” is one among many possible forms that blackness is thought to encompass.

Ontologized plasticization does not refer to the unnatural ordering of man and beast, simple objectification, or interchangeability, replaceability, or exchangeability. It is not the conceptualization of how an asset is understood as being of equal value to another. In other words, it is not a conception of the commodity and its uses. It is not a conceptualization of property—but of the properties of form. Ontologized plasticization critically engages the philosophical concept of “hylomorphism,” or the form-matter distinction. Ontologized plasticization is a conceptualization of form itself rather than a conceptualization of how a form is taken up within the logics of law, economic markets, or political economies. It is a mode of transmogrification whereby the fleshy being of blackness is experimented with as if it were infinitely malleable lexical and biological matter—a form where form shall not hold. Consequently, blackness is produced as human, subhuman, and suprahuman at once. The “at once” here is important: it denotes immediacy and simultaneity. Blackness, in this case, functions not simply as negative relation but as a plastic, fleshy being that stabilizes and gives form to “human” and “nonhuman” as categories. It is precisely via blackness’s inability to access conceptual and material stability other than by functioning as ontological instability for the reigning order that categorical forms such as “animal” and “machine” amass the semblance of both definitional clarity and endogenous coherence.

To put it another way, the concept of ontologized plasticization maintains that black(ened) people are not so much dehumanized, cast as nonhumans or as liminal humans, nor framed as animal-like or machine-like or simply exchangeable with these nonhuman forms, as they are rather cast as subhuman, suprahuman, and human simultaneously and in a manner that puts being in peril—because the operations of simultaneously being any-thing and no-thing for a given order constructs black(ened) humanity as the privation and exorbitance of form. The demand for willed privation and exorbitance that I describe does not take the structure of serialized demands for serialized states but rather demands that black(ened) humanity be all forms and no form simultaneously: human, animal, machine, object… In other words, plasticization, here, is a mode of ontologizing not at all deterred by the self-regulation of matter or its limits, nor by the fragility and finitude of the corporeal form we call “black.”

Black studies scholars have often interpreted the predicament of black(ened) being in relation to either liminality (movement from one state to another state), interstice (being in between states), or partial states. What the concept of ontologized plasticization suggests is that these appearances are undergirded by a demand that tends towards the fluidification of state or ontology. This demand for statelessness collapses a distinction between the virtual and the actual, and abstract potential and situated possibility, whereby the abstraction of blackness is enfleshed through an ongoing process of wresting form from matter. Antiblackness’s materialization is that of a de-materializing virtuality.

Hartman, Saidiya. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman. “Animal: New Directions in the Theorization of Race and Posthumanism.” Feminist Studies 39, no. 3 (2013): 669–685.

Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman. “Outer Worlds: The Persistence of Race in Movement ‘Beyond the Human’.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21, no. 2 (2015): 215–218.

Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman. Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World. New York: New York University Press, 2020.

Malabou, Catherine. Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction. Translated by Carolyn Shread. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.

Moten, Fred. In the Break: The Aesthetics of the Black Radical Tradition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.

Spillers, Hortense. “Interstices: A Small Drama of Words.” In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, edited by Carole S. Vance, 73–100. Boston: Routledge & K. Paul, 1984.

Weheliye, Alexander G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.

Wynter, Sylvia. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, after Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review 3, no. 3 (2003): 257–337.

Sketches on Everlasting Plastics, Edited by Isabelle Kirkham-Lewitt + Joanna Joseph, Columbia Books on Architecture and the City

More Sketches